Ruth Odinga Backs Edwin Sifuna

Ruth Odinga backs Edwin Sifuna
Ruth Odinga expresses support for Edwin Sifuna and calls for due process within ODM party structures.
0 0
Read Time:3 Minute, 1 Second

Ruth Odinga backs Edwin Sifuna and has openly criticised the process used to remove him from his position as secretary general of the Orange Democratic Movement (ODM). The Kisumu woman representative said the party leadership should have followed internal disciplinary procedures before taking action.

Speaking in an interview with KTN News on February 18, she stressed that party structures must be respected and members must be given a fair opportunity to defend themselves.

The political development has drawn national attention across Kenya, highlighting concerns about party governance and internal dispute resolution.

Ruth Odinga Backs Edwin Sifuna Over Party Values

Ruth Odinga said Edwin Sifuna did not violate the core principles of ODM. According to her, his actions reflected the party’s political vision and values associated with Raila Odinga.

She explained that her position is based on her understanding of the party’s constitution and leadership expectations. She also revealed that she was among members of the National Executive Committee who opposed the move to remove Sifuna.

Her remarks reinforced her stance that proper procedures must guide disciplinary decisions within political organisations.

Ruth Odinga Backs Edwin Sifuna and Demands Due Process

Ruth Odinga backs Edwin Sifuna while insisting that he deserved a fair hearing before any disciplinary action was taken. She argued that party leaders should have provided clear accusations and allowed him to respond.

According to her, due process is an essential principle that protects the rights of party officials and ensures accountability. She emphasised that disciplinary measures should only be implemented after all procedures are followed.

She also noted that in other public controversies involving allegations, individuals are typically allowed to present their defence, and political parties should maintain the same standard.

Criticism of Oburu Camp’s Decision

Odinga criticised the faction linked to Oburu Oginga for what she described as a rushed removal process. She argued that the leadership did not follow the correct channels before taking action.

She maintained that Sifuna, as secretary general, had the right to know the charges against him and respond through established party mechanisms. Her concerns reflect wider debates about transparency and fairness in party leadership decisions.

The dispute has generated political discussion in key regions including Nairobi and Kisumu, where ODM enjoys significant support.

Ruth Odinga Backs Edwin Sifuna Through Internal Party Resolution

Ruth Odinga backs Edwin Sifuna and urged the party to use internal conflict resolution systems such as arbitration, mediation, and consultations. She stressed that ODM has strong institutional frameworks capable of resolving disputes.

According to her, the party should exhaust all available structures before removing any official from office. She expressed confidence that internal dialogue could help address the current tensions if properly implemented.

Her position highlights the importance of institutional processes in maintaining political stability and trust.

Political Implications as Ruth Odinga Backs Edwin Sifuna

Ruth Odinga backs Edwin Sifuna at a time when internal disagreements are raising concerns about party unity. Political observers say such disputes can influence public perception and internal cohesion.

Her comments have intensified discussions about governance, leadership accountability, and democratic practices within ODM. The situation also underscores the importance of balancing authority with internal democracy.

The outcome of the dispute may shape future disciplinary procedures and leadership decisions within the party.

Ruth Odinga Backs Edwin Sifuna Amid ODM Dispute

Ruth Odinga backs Edwin Sifuna while calling for fairness, transparency, and adherence to party structures. Her stance reflects broader concerns about due process and institutional decision making within political organisations.

As developments continue, the dispute remains significant for understanding party governance and leadership dynamics in Kenya’s political landscape.

For More news, please visit our homepage

Happy
Happy
0 %
Sad
Sad
0 %
Excited
Excited
0 %
Sleepy
Sleepy
0 %
Angry
Angry
0 %
Surprise
Surprise
0 %

Average Rating

5 Star
0%
4 Star
0%
3 Star
0%
2 Star
0%
1 Star
0%

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

EnglishenEnglishEnglish