0
0
Tanzania’s general elections held in late October have triggered a nationwide political crisis, raising serious concerns about governance, democratic standards, and state accountability. What followed the vote went beyond a disputed election, as authorities moved forcefully to suppress opposition voices and public dissent.
Election Widely Viewed as Pre Determined
In the months before the election, government actions significantly weakened political competition. Authorities used legal measures to disqualify opposition candidates and restrict party activities. At the same time, security agencies carried out arrests, intimidation, and alleged abuses against opposition figures and civil society members.
As a result, many citizens believed the outcome was decided long before voting day. Voter turnout fell sharply, reflecting widespread fear and loss of confidence in the electoral process.
Reports of Ballot Manipulation
Despite low turnout, officials proceeded with the vote. Soon after, reports surfaced of ballot manipulation and irregularities at polling stations nationwide. When citizens protested the results, security forces responded with force.
Human rights organizations reported that police and military units used live ammunition against demonstrators. Hundreds of protesters were reportedly killed during the unrest. Several journalists covering the events also lost their lives under unclear circumstances.
Media Restrictions and Information Blackouts
As protests spread, authorities restricted access to information. Mobile internet speeds were reduced, and major social media platforms were blocked. These measures limited communication, disrupted independent reporting, and prevented coordination among protesters.
Meanwhile, state controlled messaging dominated public discourse, while independent voices faced arrests, threats, or silence.
Landslide Result Raises Questions
President Samia Suluhu Hassan, representing the ruling party, was declared the winner with more than 97 percent of the vote. The margin raised questions among regional and international observers.
Election monitoring missions from the African Union and the Southern African Development Community reported that the process failed to meet basic democratic standards. Their assessments cited violence, intimidation, lack of transparency, and restrictions on political freedoms.
Government Response and Public Distrust
Following the election, the government emphasized damage control rather than accountability. During a cabinet swearing in ceremony, President Samia acknowledged reputational harm to the country. Government officials dismissed reports of violence as external attempts to undermine Tanzania’s economy.
Authorities also canceled Independence Day celebrations scheduled for December 9, citing security concerns. Observers viewed the move as an effort to prevent further protests.
Although some detainees were released, many protesters remain in custody. Several face treason charges, which carry severe penalties. While the government announced an investigation into the violence, public confidence in the process remains low.
Youth Driven Political Awakening
The unrest marks a significant moment in Tanzania’s political history. Across East Africa, younger and urban populations are demanding transparency, accountability, and meaningful political choice.
For decades, the ruling party has maintained firm control over political life. Critics argue that loyalty to party structures has often taken priority over democratic participation. Increasingly, young Tanzanians are rejecting political systems that offer no real alternatives.
What Lies Ahead
Tanzania now faces a critical test. Rebuilding public trust will require reforms, accountability, and respect for political freedoms. Without these changes, political tension may persist.
While protests have slowed, the demand for change remains strong, particularly among younger citizens who continue to call for governance based on consent and accountability.
